Project Reporting ANNUAL REPORT FOR AWARD # 0112960

J Ramon Arrowsmith ; Arizona State University
ITR/IM+AP(GEO)Collaborative Research:Creation of a Geospatial Data System for the Transition Between the Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range Provinces (Geoinformatics in Action)

Participant Individuals:
CoPrincipal Investigator(s) : Stephen J Reynolds; Matthew J Fouch; William L Stefanov
Graduate student(s) : Lela Prashad; Chris Eisinger; Mimi Diaz; Paul Ivanich; Jesse Yoburn
Undergraduate student(s) : Amanda MacLeod

Partner Organizations:
Arizona Geological Survey: In-kind Support; Collaborative Research

We have worked with the Arizona Geological Survey colleagues to guide
some of our research and data dissemination plans and they have shared
their data with us and we have modified its format and provided useful
presentations of the geologic map data.

US Geological Survey: In-kind Support
USGS Flagstaff colleagues have provided advice on ArcIMS--IDL
linkages.  

We have consulted with Dr. Trent Hare at the USGS (Flagstaff Field
Office) on integration of an on-the-fly image processing routine
(described below) with the ArcIMS front end we have designed for the
Web-based interface. Dr. Hare is the major author of the USGS
Planetary Interactive GIS on the Web Analyzable Database (PIGWAD)
currently used to serve various Mars-related datasets. We are using
the PIGWAD system as a general model for our own web-based system.

Other collaborators:

1) We have discussed this work with Dr. David Brumbaugh of NAU to work
with him on applications of our project to the Arizona Earthquake
Information Center.  As a consequence of these discussions, Arrowsmith
and Brumbaugh wrote a proposal to the USGS NEHRP program to study the
Lake Mary Fault Zone (near Flagstaff, Arizona) and we highlighted the
available SWGEONET data. 

2) we have publicized and presented  our work to our urban ecology
colleagues across the ASU campus. 

3) We have built an informal network of data contributors--especially
the geophysical data--and are highlighting the power of the joint
analysis of the various datasets.  

4) We have had preliminary discussions with DLESE (Data Access Working
Group) and the THREDDS team for collaborating and sharing tools for
IDL-based image processing.

Activities and findings:

Research and Education Activities: 
1) Preparation of geologic map of the greater Phoenix area using 1:100,000 data from the Arizona Geological Survey. We modified the databases to include summary classifications of rock type, general geologic age, and Quaternary versus Bedrock units. 2) Remote Sensing technical analysis: Software code for on-the-fly processing of ASTER data has been written (using commercial IDL and ENVI programming and image processing software) and tested. The code was written via a subcontract with RSI (developers of IDL and ENVI software). We are now at the stage of integrating this software code with an ArcIMS front- and back-end. This on-the-fly image processing approach is desirable as it greatly reduces the need for static storage of image data products. The remotely sensed image database is currently populated only with ASTER data, but the software code is easily modified for use with other planned datasets (both satellite and airborne sensors). Remote sensing data: following final checkout of the IDL image processing routine, we are now updating the ASTER database to ensure the greatest possible coverage of the study area. Also, the ASTER radiometric and geometric calibration algorithms are periodically updated, which is an additional impetus for us to update our image database. 3) We have gathered 30m, 1:24,000 scale and 1:250,000 Digital Elevation models for Phoenix area and 15 arc second Digital Elevation model data for Arizaona in Arc Grid format. These are available for download. In addition, we are currently aquiring the 10-30 m data for the entire SWGEONET region (see the graphic on our main page: http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/) from the USGS Seamless archive of the National Elevation Dataset (http://seamless.usgs.gov). We have also done some catchment analysis using DEMs for the Indian Bend Wash in the east central Phoenix area and for Cave Creek in north Phoenix. These analyses contribute to our interests in urban geomorphology. 4) Significant effort has been expended in the compilation, vetting, processing, and visualization of geophysical data for the SWGEONET study area. Highlights include: Complete Bouguer gravity Anomaly; Heat flow, heat conductivity, and heat production; Seismic anisotropy; and Receiver functions. See these pages for more information: http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/geophys_data.htm. 5) We have assembled a digital bibliographic and geospatial landslides and mass movements database for Arizona (http://activetectonics.la.asu.edu/azgeoinf/landslides.html).

Findings:
1) Geological and geophysical data gathered and processed between 5_01_02 and 07_16_03 include: Arizona landslides and mass movements Gravity Data Heat flow, heat conductivity, and heat production Seismicity Data Seismic Anisotropy Receiver Functions Aeromagnetics 2) Remote sensing data: ASTER L1B data has been ordered for a rectangular AOI between 102 and 115 W <and> 42 and 30 N through July 15, 2003. There are approximately 2881 scenes total. This area covers all of New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, and Arizona. This is data with newer geometric corrections. We have downloaded and cataloged 903 ASTER scenes for the Colorado Plateau-Transition Zone-Basin & Range regions of CO, UT, NM, AZ, and TX. These datasets form the backbone of our remote sensing database with additions of more data from ASTER, MASTER, and other sources (ETM+ and a variety of airborne datasets) planned. These data sets and their ease of access have already permitted us to consider science applications and further project development. 3) The thematic maps of Phoenix area geology offer a more simplified view than that provided by a large database of geologic units, from which the maps are constructed. Thus, one is given a visually efficient version of a very complex subject for the purposes of presentation and a broad-scope view. These data have been of great interest to our colleagues and have been used in numerous geological, hydrogeological, ecological, and outreach applications. See this link for more: http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/phxgeo_lithtime.htm 4) Our integrated analysis of regional geophysical datasets has yielded some exciting semi-quantitative inferences which we will follow up with more detailed and quantitative analysis over the next year. Here is a recently submitted abstract (to the 2003 Geological Society of America Meeting) with the highlights: Geophysical framework of the Colorado Plateau/Basin and Range transition: Geoinformatics in Action Jesse B. Yoburn, J Ramón Arrowsmith, Matthew J. Fouch, Paul Ivanich, Department of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA G. Randy Keller Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA We are constructing an ArcGIS database to constrain the geodynamics and tectonic evolution of the southern regions of the Colorado Plateau (CP)/Arizona Transition Zone (ATZ)/Basin and Range (BR) in Arizona and New Mexico (http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet). The CP and BR have responded differently to a broad range of tectonics over the past 100 Ma. Our database includes topography, complete Bouguer gravity anomaly (CBA), heat flow, seismicity, shear wave splitting, and receiver functions, with planned additions of seismic tomography and active source seismic data. Integrated analysis characterizes the structure and dynamics of the crust and mantle beneath the BR and CP. For example, gravity, receiver functions, and heat flow all suggest relatively thicker crust in the CP and relatively thinner crust in the BR. Interpolated CBA data clearly show a relatively thickened crust beneath the CP and ATZ (~ -275 to -200 mgal) in northern Arizona and New Mexico, and a relatively thin crust of the BR (~ -100 to -50 mgal) in Arizona. The Rio Grande Rift (RGR) also appears as a ~100 mgal local increase. Receiver function data show a thickening of the crust from ~35 km in NW Arizona to ~45 km in south-central Colorado. Differences in heat flow values suggest thicker crust beneath the CP relative to the BR: heat flow is lower near the southern CP (<50 mW/m2), and higher in the southern BR and the RGR (>150mW/m2). While changes in lithospheric thickness likely contribute to the heat flow variations, they suggest thicker crust beneath the CP relative to the BR. Another example shows the relationship between topographic gradients, regional seismicity, and the inferred mantle flow field. The CP has a surface elevation of >1500 m and drops by ~1000 m over a lateral distance 50-100 km into the ATZ. This pronounced relief contrast is associated with enhanced seismicity in the southern CP. Active fault data show E-W extension in the RGR and southern Arizona and NE-SW extension in the southern CP. These observations correlate with the limited body of shear wave splitting measurements which exhibit ~NE-SW fast polarization directions across Arizona. Nearly N-S fast polarization directions for the RGR suggest a change in the relationship between active surface deformation and mantle fabric across the region.

Training and Development:
Graduate and undergraduate students working on the project have learned or will learn GIS, database, web authoring, presentation, and computer skills, are participating in our efforts to integrate earth science knowledge, and are aware of the interdisciplinary applications of the data system. Importantly, our web site includes a links page with a knowledge base of how-to-do certain important and geologically or geophysically important tasks: http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/links.htm All but one of the knowledge base entries was written by our team.

Outreach Activities:
We continue to educate our urban ecology and other cross-campus colleagues of the value of quality earth sciece data in useful formats as context or fodder for their own research. Arrowsmith has given these talks that are dominantly outreach: --Geospatial and geotemporal (3D and 4D) challenges and opportunities empasizing the urban environment (ASU-SDSC strategic meeting at the Holiday Bowl; December 2002) --Arid land sedimentary environments and deposits (Presentation in ASU Geoarcheology class; February 2003) --Desert geology (Design with the Desert Conference; March 2003). --Geospatial and Geotemporal (3D and 4D) Challenges and Opportunities Emphasizing the Urban-Natural Environment and Active Tectonics (Presentation to PRISM group at ASU, May 2003) Links to these talks are available at: http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Presentations.html

Journal Publications:
Ramon Arrowsmith, "Active tectonic, landform analysis, fault distribution and kinematics: how geoinformatics can help", Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, GS03, abstract MS30-4, vol. MS30, (2003), p. 4. Published
Arrowsmith, J R., Keller, G. R., Prashad, L., Diaz, M., Stefanov, W. L., Eisinger, C., Fouch, M., Reynolds, S., Richard, S. M., Pearthree, P. A., "A Geospatial Data System for the Transition between the Colorado Plateau and Basin and Range Provinces: an Essential Tool for Basic and Applied Research in Earth Science and Urban Ecology", GSA Abstracts with Programs, Paper No. 97-8, vol. 97, (2002), p. 8. Published

Book(s) of other one-time publications(s):

Other Specific Products:

Data or databases
Phoenix Area geology
Arizona geology
30m, 1:24,000 scale Digital Elevation model for Phoenix area
1:250,000 scale Digital Elevation model for Phoenix area
15 arc second scale Digital Elevation model for Arizona
Arizona cities
Arizona highways
Arizona counties
PHX roads
ASTER index map for AZ and bordering states
AZ faults from AZGS with attributes
AZ faults from USGS no attributes
AZ Eqs  1830-1998
NM and bordering area EQ’s 1869 1998
Gravity Data
Heat flow, heat conductivity, and heat production
Seismic Anisotropy 
Receiver Functions
Aeromagnetics
Arizona landslides and mass movements
These data are available for download as raw data, as well as in
Arcview Shape files for easily plotting by users.  We are still
working on the details of credit and download policies.
Powerpoint presentation
A geospatial data system for the transition between the colorado
plateau and the basin and range provinces: An essential tool for basic
and applied research in earth science and urban ecology (Geological
Society of America Annual meeting; October 2002, also a slightly
earlier version)
Downloadable powerpoint presentation
(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerpoints/Arrows
ithGSA2002_10_02/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Active and neo-tectonics, fault systems, landform analysis (GEON
Kickoff meeting; November 2002)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/ArrowsmithGEONkickoff_11_02/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Geospatial and geotemporal (3D and 4D) challenges and opportunities
empasizing the urban environment (ASU-SDSC strategic meeting at the
Holiday Bowl; December 2002)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/holidayBowl_12_02_sdsc_talk/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Urbanization along the lower Cave Creek drainage: Observations using
remote sensing and GIS (Lela Prashad with Chris Eisinger, also as an
Adobe Acrobat document) (December 2002)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/CaveCreek2002final_proj_11_02/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Arid land sedimentary environments and deposits (Presentation in ASU
Geoarcheology class; February 2003)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/Arid%20land%20sedimentary%20environments%20and%20deposits_2_03/in
ex.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Active tectonic, landform analysis, fault distribution and kinematics:
How Geoinformatics can help (SIAM Conference talk - Conference on
Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences; March 2003)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/ArrowsmithSIAM03_3_03/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Geophysics (Presentation at UTEP by Jesse Yoburn, April 2003)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/GeophysicsJYoburnUTEP/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Delivering Geoinformatics Data to the Public (Presentation at UTEP by
Lela Prashad, April 2003)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/prashad_utep/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
ASTER Instrument (Presentation at UTEP by Chris Eisinger, April 2003)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/ASTER_SWGEONET/index.html)
Powerpoint presentation
Geospatial and Geotemporal (3D and 4D) Challenges and Opportunities
Emphasizing the Urban-Natural Environment and Active Tectonics
(Presentation to PRISM group at ASU, May 2003)
Downloadable Powerpoint
presentation(http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/Data/Powerp
ints/ArrowsmithPRISM5_2_03/index.html)

Internet Dissemination:

http://activetectonics.la.asu.edu/azgeoinf/ http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/

The http://www.geoinformaticsnetwork.org/swgeonet/ is the main web
page for the ASU and UTEP teams.  We are tracking the access to the
site:
Month   Unique visitors Number of visits    Pages   Hits    Bandwidth   Mb
Feb-03  43  50  268 505 32.64 MB    32.64
Mar-03  150 206 804 2652    291.10 MB   291.1
Apr-03  253 321 1301    4863    650.75 MB   650.75
May-03  215 262 881 2660    269.43 MB   269.43
Jun-03  267 325 809 2412    241.56 MB   241.56
Jul-03  161 217 603 1380    219.90 MB   219.9
totals  1089    1381    4666    14472   0   1705.38
mean/month  227 288 972 3015    0   355
mean/day    7   9   32  98  0   12

the important numbers there are that we have had about 1100 unique
visitors, 14472 hits, and shipped about 220 Mb of html/data over the
last 4.8 months.  Our pages are regularly crawled by search engines
and as our content increases, we will probably see more and more
accesses.

Contributions:

Contributions within Discipline:

 The synthesis of diverse earth science datasets into a common
geospatial framework by earth scientists is an important initial
effort in the study of the construction and applications of earth
science data systems. Recent developments document that our efforts
are being recongnized in the geosciences community.  For example,
Arrowsmith has been invited to participate in the National Center for
Airborne Laser Mapping (NCALM) as advisory committee member, partially
based on his experience with this project.


Contributions to Other Disciplines:
 The synthesis of these diverse earth science datasets into common
geospatial data frameworks provides the potential for their evaluation
in the study of urban ecological, location research, and digital
government processes.

Contributions to Education and Human Resources:
 This work promotes the significance and illustrates the quality and
quantity of earth science data.  The diverse student work group is
learning to work together and energized and enriched by the
experience.


Contributions to Resources for Science and Technology:
 This data system is a valuable resource for student and faculty
research and for project and proposal development. I has been
presented to numerous faculty and student groups and used in classes.
In addition, we have written two proposals leveraging these data.  
Analysis and checkout of the IDL image processing code has provided
PIs and graduate students with experience in IDL code syntax and
programming structure.


Contributions Beyond Science and Engineering:
 The common framework of these data and the education of the PIs and
the students in the language of geoinformatics provides the potential
for important linkages with industry and agency data managers and
decisionmakers.

Special Requirements for Annual Project Report:

Unobligated funds: less than 20 percent of current funds


Categories for which nothing is reported:
Products: Book or other one-time publication
Special Reporting Requirements
Animal, Human Subjects, Biohazards